You have been given a deadline by the company holding your file, and nobody has told you whether it is a real one.
The 30 days for the reinvestigation is 15 U.S.C. §1681i, and it is real.
Send two letters the same day: the dispute to the screening company (it starts the only binding clock there is) and a one-page hold request to the platform, with your evidence attached and the dispute reference quoted. The first letter is the one that gets sent, not the second — and the second is the one that speaks to whoever is actually deciding whether you work next week.
“I tried reaching out to Checkr, but they told me there was some kind of 30-day limit after deactivation to dispute it.”
We hear this most. r/doordash_drivers, 2026 — from someone in the same position.
One of the deadlines in this story is in the statute and one of them is not. The five-business-day pre-adverse window everybody quotes is an FTC staff advisory opinion from June 27, 1997 — guidance, not law. We are not going to sell you urgency on a number that is not.
Read this first, because this page used to be different from the rest of the site. Nothing on this page is for sale, and the only thing an ordinary page here collects is the optional question box at its foot. There is now nothing to buy on this page and no email box on it either. The demand test that used to sit further down is over and what it measured is written out where it stood. The whole method below is free and stays free.
A background check stops your income overnight, and getting anyone on the phone who can undo it is the hard part. The report is produced by a company you never hired, the platform points at the company, the company points at its portal, and the clock the law gives that company to investigate is 30 days — longer than the platform's decision will wait, and far longer than rent will.
By the end of this page you have three letters written for you, the evidence each error type needs, and the two dates that are actually in the statute — and you know which of the deadlines you have been quoted is not one.
Our own full-text scan of 28,377,895 rows of the federal CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, 2026-09-06. Text mentions in complaint narratives, not official per-company tallies — a relative signal of where people report problems, and it understates, because a complaint without a narrative is not counted at all. Across the 3 employment screeners we track there are 5,869 mentions in total. Checkr's full breakdown →
CFPB published complaint narratives, 2011 - August 14, 2026. The CFPB ceased discretionary publication of complaint narratives on August 14, 2026, so every narrative-derived count on this site is a closed series and will not change. Complaint intake continues, and the per-company outcome table runs on all complaints and is current.
One dispute, one hold request, one correction at source — sent in that order, on the same day where you can. The whole system is below and it costs nothing to use.
Why first: this is the only letter that starts a legal clock, and since the CFPB's June 24, 2026 complaint-system change it is also the step the regulator expects you to have completed before it will take a complaint from you. Send it through the company's own dispute portal (Checkr, First Advantage and HireRight all have one) and keep a dated copy.
Re: dispute of inaccurate and incomplete information — report reference [report ID from the copy they sent you]
I dispute the following item in the report you supplied about me: [quote the entry exactly as it is printed].
This item is [inaccurate — it does not relate to me / the date, amount or disposition is wrong] [or incomplete — the filing is reported without its outcome, and the case was dismissed on [date]].
Enclosed, as evidence: [list every document, by name].
Under 15 U.S.C. §1681i I request a reasonable reinvestigation, deletion of what cannot be verified, a corrected copy of my report, and notification of the correction to every party that received this report. My contact details are above; my report reference is [report ID].
Incomplete beats inaccurate when the case was dismissed. If an eviction or a charge genuinely was filed, "this is inaccurate" invites the CRA to verify the filing and close the dispute — because the filing did happen. "This is incomplete: the disposition is missing, and here it is from the clerk" is the harder thing for them to verify away.
This is the letter that keeps the income. The dispute in Letter 1 fixes the report on the CRA's timetable — up to 30 days, and 45 days if you send more information while it runs. The platform's decision runs on no timetable at all. Guides tell you to dispute. The letter they leave out is the one to the party actually holding the decision, on the same day, with your evidence attached.
Re: [driver / applicant ID], background report dated [date]
I received your notice of [deactivation / pre-adverse action] dated [date], based on a consumer report from [Checkr / other].
That report contains an error, and I disputed it in writing with [company] on [date], reference [dispute ID]. The error is: [one sentence].
Attached is the documentary evidence: [court disposition order / W-2 / former employer's written confirmation / photo ID showing the mismatch].
I am asking you to hold the final decision until the reinvestigation concludes, and to reinstate my account if the corrected report clears. I will send you the corrected report as soon as I receive it. I can be reached at [phone] and [email].
Send it the same day you send Letter 1, so you can quote the dispute reference. Polite, one page, evidence attached, a specific ask. Nothing in federal law requires the platform to agree — which is exactly why the letter has to be good, and why the evidence has to be attached rather than described.
Why bother: the CFPB's own guidance says to write to the screening company and the source of the information. Both letters matter, and the source is often the only party that can make the correction stick — because a CRA that "verifies" with the same source gets the same wrong answer back. For screening errors the furnisher is usually a court clerk's records office, a former employer's HR or payroll department, or a prior landlord.
Re: records relating to [your full name], [date of birth], [case or employee number]
A consumer reporting company is reporting the following about me, sourced from your records: [quote the entry].
This is [wrong / incomplete] because [one sentence]. Enclosed: [evidence].
Please [issue a certified copy of the disposition / correct your record / confirm my dates of employment in writing]. A background report based on your records is currently costing me [my job / my ability to work], so I would be grateful for a written reply I can forward.
The CFPB announced an overhaul of its consumer complaint system after credit-repair firms, influencers and automated tools flooded it. Two of the changes matter to you directly:
So the sequence below is not a stylistic preference. Letter 1 to the screening company is what makes a later CFPB complaint viable at all. Skip it and the escalation route closes behind you.
Source: CFPB newsroom, "The CFPB is correcting flaws to restore integrity and utility to the consumer complaint system", June 24, 2026 — consumerfinance.gov. Verified August 20, 2026.
A dispute is won by the attachment, not the wording. Find your error in the left column and send exactly what is in the middle column — copies, never originals.
| What went wrong | What to attach | Where to get it |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed file — it's someone else's record | Photo ID; Social Security card or the last four digits as printed on the report; address history for the years in question (leases, utility bills); the report entry itself with its mismatched identifiers circled | Your own files; the free report copy from the screening company |
| Dismissed, sealed or expunged case still showing | The certified disposition order, or the sealing / expungement order, showing the case number and the outcome | The clerk of the court that heard the case — ask for a certified copy of the disposition; expect a small fee |
| Eviction filing reported with no outcome | The docket sheet showing dismissal, settlement or judgment for you; the payment ledger or the signed move-out agreement | The housing court clerk; your own bank records; the former landlord or agent |
| Employment dates or employer name wrong | W-2s or 1099s for the years disputed; pay stubs from the first and last month; an email from the former employer confirming the dates; your badge or offer letter | Your tax records (IRS transcripts if you have lost the originals); the former employer's HR or payroll |
| Name change not matched (married, legal change) | The marriage certificate or the court order of name change; documents in both names covering the same period | Vital records office; the court that issued the order |
| Driving record — violation isn't yours or was dismissed | Your official state driving record; the court disposition for the citation | Your state DMV or licensing agency; the traffic court clerk |
| Debt shown open that you paid | Proof of payment: cleared check, bank statement line, the creditor's paid-in-full or settlement letter | Your bank; the creditor — ask specifically for a written paid-in-full letter |
Send copies and keep the originals. Number the attachments in the letter ("Exhibit 1: certified disposition, Case No. …") so a corrected reply can refer to them.
There is no statutory waiting period between a pre-adverse-action notice and the final decision. 15 U.S.C. §1681b(b)(3) requires an employer to give you a copy of the report and a written summary of your rights before taking adverse action. It sets no number of days. The familiar "five business days" comes from an FTC staff advisory opinion to Weisberg dated June 27, 1997, which called a five-day gap reasonable and said in the same paragraph that the facts of a particular situation may require a different time. It is guidance to employers, not a right you can hold them to, and some states and cities require longer.
Anyone telling you the law gives you five to seven days is telling you something the statute does not say. We are not going to sell you urgency on a number that is not real — and the truth is more urgent anyway: the platform can finalize at any moment, and the only clock that is actually binding runs for 30 days on the other side. That gap is the entire problem this page is about.
| Clock | Length | Is it law? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gap between the pre-adverse notice and the final decision | Unspecified — "before" adverse action | No fixed period | 15 U.S.C. §1681b(b)(3); the five-business-day figure is FTC staff guidance (Advisory Opinion to Weisberg, June 27, 1997) |
| CRA reinvestigation of your dispute | 30 days from the day they receive it | Yes — statutory | 15 U.S.C. §1681i(a)(1)(A) |
| Extension when you send more information mid-investigation | +15 days (45 days in total) | Yes — statutory | 15 U.S.C. §1681i(a)(1)(B) |
| Requesting your free report copy after an adverse action | 60 days | Yes — free-copy entitlement | 15 U.S.C. §1681j(b), as explained in FTC and CFPB consumer guidance |
Checked against the statute text on August 20, 2026. General information, not legal advice — your notice and the agencies' own pages govern your case. A note on gig work specifically: platforms generally run these as employment-purpose checks and send pre-adverse notices through the screening company, but whether every contractor screening is an "employment purpose" under §1681a(h) is contested. Your dispute rights under §1681i are not contested, which is another reason Letter 1 goes first.
Three months from now the only question that matters is "what did you send, to whom, on what date, and can you show it?" Keep a single sheet, on paper or in a note on your phone:
| Date sent | To whom | How | Tracking / reference | Enclosures | Reply received |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e.g. Sep 12 | Checkr — dispute portal | Portal upload | Dispute ID from the confirmation screen | Exhibits 1–3 | — |
| e.g. Sep 12 | Platform support | Email + in-app | Ticket number | Exhibits 1–3 | — |
| e.g. Sep 13 | Clerk of Court, [county] | USPS Certified Mail, return receipt | Certified article number | Exhibit 4 | — |
There was, briefly, a box on this page asking whether a paid packet should exist that would fill these three letters in with your dates and cut the evidence list down to your error type. It carried a price. Eight people saw it. One clicked. Nobody left an address. That is not a verdict on the idea — it is eight people — but it is enough to stop us building against it, and we would rather tell you that than leave a price on a page for a thing that does not exist. Later we built a smaller version of it on a page of its own (it fills in two of the three letters); this page did not change.
So: the method above is complete, it is free, and it stays free. If you use it and something on this page is wrong or a step does not work, write to hello@getaxionlabs.com and I will fix it.
— Andrew at Axion Labs
If the report has already cost you income — the account stayed deactivated, the offer was withdrawn, the reinstatement never came — the honest next step is not another letter. It is a consumer FCRA attorney, and the economics are unusual: the statute shifts fees to the losing defendant, so this category of lawyer generally works on contingency and charges the consumer nothing up front. Ask any firm to confirm that in writing before you engage them.
What to bring, so the first call is useful: the report itself; the pre-adverse or deactivation notice with its date; your dispute and the date you sent it; the screening company's reply; your proof-of-service sheet; and evidence of what the loss cost you — earnings statements from the weeks before and after.
We take no referral fee and recommend no firm. We are telling you this because the free method below cannot help someone whose loss has already happened, and pretending otherwise would be the same trick this site was built to argue against.
If the record is accurate — the case was real and it ended badly, the dates are right, the conviction is yours — a dispute will not remove it and no letter on this page will change the outcome. Reinvestigation verifies accurate records and they stay. This page is for people hit by a wrong record: someone else's case, a dismissal reported without its outcome, dates that are simply incorrect. That boundary is the whole reason to trust anything else we tell you.
Not on this page. This page ran an open demand test for an assembly packet: eight people saw it, one clicked, and nobody left an address, so the box came down. The site now has one packet like it, on its own page: the Screening Dispute Kit, which fills in two of these letters (the dispute and the hold request) with your company and your dates. The letter to the source of the record stays here, free. Nothing is for sale on this page, no payment is taken here and no email is asked for. The method — the three letters, the evidence checklist, the deadline sheet and the proof-of-service log — is written out in full on this page and always was.
No, and it matters that you know it. 15 U.S.C. §1681b(b)(3) requires the employer to give you a copy of the report and a summary of your rights before taking adverse action, but it sets no waiting period. The familiar five-business-day figure comes from an FTC staff advisory opinion to Weisberg dated June 27, 1997, which called five days reasonable while noting a particular situation may require a different time. Treat it as what an employer might do, never as a right you can enforce — and act today rather than on day four.
The screening company's. Under 15 U.S.C. §1681i(a)(1)(A) it must complete a reasonable reinvestigation within 30 days of receiving your dispute, extended by up to 15 further days — 45 days in total — under §1681i(a)(1)(B) if you send relevant additional information during the 30-day window. That clock is the problem rather than the solution: it can easily run longer than the platform's patience, which is why the letter to the platform goes out the same day as the dispute.
Since June 24, 2026, effectively yes. The CFPB overhauled its complaint system and states that consumers must first exhaust their dispute rights directly with consumer reporting agencies before coming to the Bureau, with new administrative routes for returning complaints that skipped that step. It also now requires third parties filing on a consumer's behalf to disclose their involvement. Send the dispute first; the complaint is a later step, not a first one.
No, and nothing on this site will pretend otherwise. Disputes fix errors — records that are not yours, dates that are wrong, cases that were dismissed and reported without the outcome. An accurate record survives a reinvestigation and stays. If the record is real, what helps is documenting it, second-chance programs, and time.
You do not have to, and nothing on this page asks you to. The letters are here, complete, and copying them costs nothing. The paid kit sells time, not information: it fills in two of the same letters for your company and dates and hands you the calendar, for the evening you cannot face assembling them. The demand test on this page was eight people, too few to say whether that is worth paying for, so the kit carries its own test: no stranger sale by November 30, 2026 and the offer is rebuilt, not left running.
No. This page asks for nothing at all now — no email, no name, no phone number, no Social Security number, no case details and no card. Do not send us your screening report. Every page here ends with the same optional box asking what you came to find out, and it is the only place an ordinary page keeps anything you type: if you type in it, we store what you type, the page you were on, and the time you sent it. That is the whole record. We do not ask for and do not store your name, your email address, your IP address, or your postal address. Answers are kept for four months and then deleted automatically. Two taps are counted as well: the first time you use a free tool on a page, and your answer if you press Yes or Not really under Was this easy. For those we keep the page, the time, which button, and whether the request came from a browser or an automated program, never anything you typed, for the same four months.
| When | What happens | Whose move |
|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Adverse action — you are denied, or offered worse terms, because of a consumer report. You must be told this happened and told which company supplied the report. | The landlord, employer or bank |
| Days 0–60 | Request your free copy of that report from the screening company. Federal law says within 60 days of the adverse action. It is the actual report, not the landlord's summary. | You |
| Day X | Read it line by line against your own records and dispute every inaccurate item in writing, with copies of your evidence attached. The dispute is free. | You |
| +30 days | The screening company is generally required to investigate and to correct or delete what it cannot verify. Typically 30 days from receiving your dispute. | The screening company |
| +45 days | The same, extended, where you supplied additional information during the investigation. | The screening company |
| After | If they verify something you know is wrong: add a statement of dispute to your file, complain free to the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov (companies must respond), and to your state attorney general. | You |
Every step above is free. Anyone charging you to exercise these rights is selling you a letter you can write yourself.
Where these dates come from, so you can check them yourself rather than take our word for it. 15 U.S.C. §1681j is the free-copy section: it gives you the report without charge if you ask within 60 days of the adverse-action notice, and one free file disclosure every 12 months besides. 15 U.S.C. §1681i is the dispute section: the screening company gets 30 days to reinvestigate, extended by up to 15 further days — 45 days in total — if you send relevant information while it is running. 15 U.S.C. §1681m is the notice section: the adverse-action notice you were sent is required to include an indication of that 60-day period. Plain-English versions of the same rules: FTC, free credit reports and FTC, disputing errors on your credit report.
General information based on the US Fair Credit Reporting Act, checked against the statute text on August 20, 2026, and on FTC and CFPB consumer guidance. Not legal advice, and no professional relationship is created by reading it. We are not lawyers and make no claim to do what one does. No outcome is promised or predicted. Your notice and the agencies' own pages govern your case. Free official routes: consumerfinance.gov and your state attorney general.
Thank you. That goes straight to the person who writes these pages.
That didn't send — try once more.